|
|
This site maintained by: Aomar Boum. Site last updated on October, 2001. |
Journal
of Political Ecology:
Case Studies in History and Society |
|
|
VOLUME 4 (1997)
The Trail of
the Hare: Environment and Stress in a Sub-Arctic Community. Second
edition. By Joel S. Savishinsky. Langhorne, PA: Gordon and Breach, 1994,
294 pp. map, illustrations, tables, bibliography, index. First published in 1974, this second
edition of Savishinsky s monograph of the Hare Indians of the Colville
Lake area of the Canadian Northwest Territories provides an expanded,
updated portrait of stress and stress management among the Athabascans
(Dene) of this harsh region. As a basic ethnography on the Hare, this
work is quite detailed and comprehensive, with chapters on "Ecology
and Community," "Kinship and History," "Stress and
Mobility," "The Missionary and the Fur Trader," and finally
"The Hare and the Dog," a probing look at the complex involvement
of dogs in Hare economic, social, and emotional life. Savishinsky attempts
to derive a generalized model for evaluating the environmental, social,
and psychological stresses that confront Hare villagers. To mitigate the varied sources of
stress that affect them--including scarcity of resources, extreme weather,
reciprocal obligations, periodic bush isolation and village crowding,
poor health, drinking, etc.-- the Hare employ a repertoire of coping mechanisms
or "response features" including: mobility, respect for individual
autonomy, generosity and sharing, and emotional restraint and displacement
(often onto dogs). These traits are legendary among Interior Athabaskan
groups and in the case of the Hare have persisted despite the acculturative
forces of missions, towns, schools, wage labor, and other incursions.
In the late 1960s, and even today, many Hare still follow an annual cycle
of dispersal (for hunting and trapping) and "ingathering" (for
fishing, wage jobs, and holidays). Stress is viewed not only as a negative
force but also as a positive source of motivation to adapt and develop
more varied approaches to the ambiguities of their existence. The value of Savishinsky s multidimensional
approach is that stress and responses to stress are not reduced to one
sphere or currency. Thus, whereas an optimal foraging theorist might evaluate
a hunter s decision to strike out into the bush on his own (or in a particular
group) as an economic decision based on maximizing utility/fitness, Savishinsky
finds that many decisions concerning residence and mobility are motivated
as much by social factors--particularly interpersonal stresses--as economic
ones. Thus, "the size of groups at different times of the year has
its psychological as well as its ecological significance" (p.146).
Similarly, mobility is not simply a response to stress but a positive
state of being, and the trail a "metaphor for life" (p.145). Yet, while the focus on stress provides
a unifying theme to the narrative, as a theoretical construct it ultimately
sags under its own weight. Savishinsky is guilty of what Giovanni Sartori
calls "conceptual stretching," extending the label of "stress"
to so many phenomena that it loses its salience
and explanatory value. Even anthropology itself is defined as "stress-seeking"
behavior (p. 252). Not surprisingly, Savishinsky concludes in Chapter
7 that nearly every stress--be it isolation, drinking, or gossip--is also
a coping strategy. He rationalizes this redundancy by arguing that stress
and stress reduction together comprise a dynamic and dialectic process
which works on a number of levels, and by invoking Martin Buber, who schools
us on "the paradox that every Thou in our world must become an It"
(p. 219). I don t question the paradoxical nature of stress but wonder
what happened to Savishinsky s attempt to develop an operational model
for evaluating and predicting the particular manifestations of and responses
to stress in this northern hunter-gatherer community. In the end, this
objective seems to get lost in the existential shuffle, "the exalted
melancholy of our fate" (Buber again), wherein all is stress and
coping. On balance, however, this theoretical
problem along with other minor issues, such as the unreflective retention
of some problematic functionalist terms (e.g., homeostasis, equilibrium,
and disequilibrium), should not dissuade readers from engaging this otherwise
rich and incisive ethnography. In updating the work for this edition,
Savishinsky offers substantive revisions, including analysis of contemporary
"stresses" faced by the Hare and neighboring indigenous communities
in maintaining their land base, balancing traditional hunting and modern
wage economies, and achieving greater political sovereignty. These new
stresses include everything from animal rights activists to oil and gas
development. Although much of the contemporary data is based on secondary
literature, the author s review of this literature is solid and thoughtfully
integrative. |