|
|
This site maintained by: Aomar Boum. Site last updated on October, 2001. |
Journal
of Political Ecology:
Case Studies in History and Society |
|
|
VOLUME 5 (1998)
Sustainable Global
Communities in the Information Age, edited by Kaoru Yamaguchi, Westport,
CT: Praeger, 1997, 218 pp.
Reviewed by Daniel P. Dolan, Research Fellow, Center for Global Communications, International University of Japan. The thesis advanced by the editor
of this collection is that because the information age is radically different
from the industrial age, a new socieoeconomic system is needed that is
sustainable, community based, and can accommodate and use new information
technology. Twenty three contributors and 20 chapters later, the reader
has been informed of why the cognitive revolution in psychology is important,
what future-oriented projects UNESCO has taken on recently (in what seems
like a three and one-half page infomercial), how the spinning wheel and
pit loom can revitalize communities in India, and where a proposed futures-focused
university to be called The Network University of the Green World should
be located (answer: on a small island in Japan). The book is challenging to read.
Futures studies combines research, assessment, and policy making as it
pulls from a wide range of academic disciplines, including sociology,
political science, and economics. This complexity places difficult organizational
demands on any attempt at a multiple-author treatment of topics. Sustainable
Global Communities is in places informative and provocative, but more
noticeably, it is distractingly inconsistent and insufficiently focused.
Synthesis could have been enhanced greatly by weeding out the relatively
less pertinent essays and by adding transitions between chapters, or at
least between sections. Without such integration, key points are made
outside the frame of any discernible narrative, which weakens the central
argument. One source of these difficulties
is revealed in the preface, in which the editor describes how the contributions
were originally presented at a 1993 seminar held on the Japanese island
of Awaji, which he acknowledges dates the material considerably. The book
is little more than a compilation of these various presentations, some
of which have been updated for publication. A light editorial hand results
in duplication of background material, and a less well-developed context
for absorbing these presentations in their written form than one would
normally receive from the give and take of an intimate and rustic seminar
setting. The material is presented in four
sections, "Environmental Issues and Futures Studies" (four chapters),
"New Framework of Community Economy" (three chapters), "Building
Sustainable Communities Globally" (ten chapters), and "Sustainable
Community Projects in Awaji Island" (three chapters). ). I will mention
those essays which in my judgment contribute most centrally to the theme
of the project or otherwise invite recognition. Jerome Karle's brief overview of
the present health of the planet stresses the importance of "quality
of life" as a critical factor in assessments and decisions made regarding
the environment, technology, and sustainability. He refers to population
control, sustainability, and proper human behavior as "indispensables"
that must be managed responsibly and over the long term in any attempt
to attain widespread improvement in living conditions. Sustainability is the focus of Kaoru
Yamaguchi's chapter, of which the first eight pages are dense with formulas
and are perhaps of most interest to trained economists. His thesis is
that "the capitalist market economy is a fatally distorted system
in the sense that it cannot appreciate the most important values for a
better life and sustainable development, such as labour value, information
value and ecological value." Yamaguchi advocates instead what he
calls a "MuRatopian economy" based on "information-sharing
networks," "self-management and participatory democracy,"
and "sustainable development." His discussion is intriguing,
but his claim that "the MuRatopian economy is a system superior to
the capitalist market economy" is grounded in little more than conjecture. One example of a component of the
system described by Yamaguchi is the "Community Land Trust,"
which is the topic of the five-page essay by Matthei and LaFontaine. A
"Community Land Trust" is a "democratically structured,
community-based, non-profit corporation" that is both publicly and
privately owned, and which the authors argue meets both immediate and
future housing needs within an economic model that supports the health
of communities. They also point out that although Community Land Trusts
face many challenges such as over-professionalization and undue dependency
on sources of financing, these communities are flourishing in the United
States. A more radical alternative perspective
on alternative communities is laid out in Brian Tokar's informative and
well-written treatment of what he calls the environmental justice movement,
radical wilderness activism, bioregionalism, and Green politics. Tokar
criticizes "leading US environmental organizations" for "compromising
away the tremendous visionary potential of ecological thought" by
focusing on short-term policy goals "within the limits of existing
political and economic institutions." Instead, he challenges citizens
to imagine possibilities for resource management outside the influence
of huge organizations and international agencies and to consider decentralized,
local approaches to community building and environmental policies. Tokar
also proposes that new communication technologies be employed openly and
cooperatively in the service of exchanging ideas and information between
and within communities, in contrast to the thread of technophobia woven
through many of the other essays. Information technology also has
a place in Qin Linzheng's discussion of rural community development in
China. He explains how farmers in remote areas "are beginning to
understand the place and role of information for decision making in production,
management and administration." Developments in information technology
and information management are just one part of what Linzheng sees as
the need for extensive economic reforms based on the socialist market
economy. He argues that citizens of rural communities should govern themselves
so that they can make quick and informed decisions about which markets
to enter and how to conduct activities. Additional hurdles to sustainable
community development in rural China include wide disparities in income,
overpopulation, rising crime rates, and environmental disasters both natural
and human generated. In his treatment of sustainability
in the Philippines, Cesar Villanueva begins by distinguishing between
sustainable development and sustainable communities. The latter concept,
he suggests, puts focus on the local level and facilitates the analysis
of specific present conditions and the generation of specific proposals
for reform. Villanueva emphasizes that community development and sustainable
community can be compatible only if critical issues of equity, environment
and development are addressed. Huge gaps in income result in crippling
disparities in access to natural resources. Strategies for dealing with
environmental degradation must be engineered at the community level, which
should positively impact property rights reforms. "Sociocultural,
economic, political and spiritual" development should be better rather
than more. Finally, Stevenson, Burkett and
San Myint discuss how what they call "integrated communications and
information technology" such as digital video applications can expedite
connections between local communities on a global scale and encourage
decentralization. They provide the example of the Local/Global Netweaving
Program in Australia, founded on the principles of connection between
local and global communities, participation in both local and global activities,
communication, and practical action. Importantly, the authors stress that
interactive information technology must be supported by a framework of
use in line with values that recognize equality of persons "irrespective
of economic background, race, gender, geography, or other characteristics."
The alternative, they insist, is a future in which machines shape and
control societies. This scattered and uneven collection of essays will be most useful for nonspecialist readers interested in examples of local approaches to sustainable community development. The importance of quality of life in notions of sustainability, the effectiveness of community-level governance, and Community Land Trusts as an alternative to wholly public or private home ownership are particularly memorable topics. Although it is not well suited for the classroom or as an academic resource, the casual reader by judiciously skipping about with an interest in the issues likely will become better informed and possibly inspired to investigate further. |