|
|
This site maintained by: Aomar Boum. Site last updated on October, 2001. |
Journal
of Political Ecology:
Case Studies in History and Society |
|
|
VOLUME 6 (1999)
The Political
Ecology of Bananas: Contract Farming, Peasants, and Agrarian Change in
the Eastern Caribbean. By Lawrence S. Grossman. Chapel Hill: University
of North Carolina Press (1998) xviii, 268 pp.
Reviewed by Mark Moberg, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, University of South Alabama Until
the early 1980s, the persistence of "peasants" in the commercial
agricultural sectors of postcolonial societies prompted acrimonious debate
among political economists. Are small-scale farmers who rely on household
labor destined to extinction in competition with larger capitalist farms,
as Marx originally argued? Are they a source of "spontaneous
capitalism," prone to social differentiation into proletarians and
commercial farmers, as Lenin claimed? Conversely, are they able to
out-compete commercial farms due to their famed capacity for "self-exploitation,"
as Chayanov had contended? Finally, many neo-Marxists, such as Deere
and De Janvry, challenged the very terms of the debate by noting that
what appeared to be rural cultivators were in fact "disguised"
or semi-proletarians. As De Janvry (1981) observed in the most compelling
contribution to the exchange, the peasant question is fraught with practical
and political implications that far exceed the semantics of the debate. Indeed,
the exchange may have been so exceptionally fervent because it recapitulated
Soviet policy debates that ended in collectivization and the persecution
of scholars and policy-makers who favored a smallholder-based rural economy.
If the
peasant studies debate of the 1970s and 80s vanished into the post-structuralist
tide that later overtook the social sciences, the issues it raised, like
the peasantry itself, have stubbornly refused to go away. Recent
decades have actually witnessed an expansion of peasant involvement in
commercial agriculture in much of the developing world, seemingly in defiance
of political economists' predictions of a "disappearing" peasantry
or one that is consigned to staple production. Are such trends a
vindication of Chayanov and final refutation of Marxist political economy? In
The Political Ecology of Bananas, Lawrence Grossman demonstrates that
peasant persistence in export production is related less to the resilience
of household economies than to the interests of the multinational firms
that market peasant produce in the developed world. Grossman's book
is one of several recent studies examining a significant structural change
occurring in tropical agriculture over recent decades: the shift from
vertically-integrated plantation production under direct corporate control
to various forms of sub-contracting, often involving household-based units
of production. Such arrangements have been initiated by most of the
corporations that dominate world markets in crops such as bananas, coffee,
cacao, citrus and sugar, and are now commonplace in Africa, Asia, Latin
America, as well as the Eastern Caribbean context that Grossman documents.
Unlike
the earlier peasant studies literature, which remained at the levels of
household and national economies, recent analyses have situated contract
farming within the changing framework (or "mode of regulation")
governing global capital accumulation since the 1970s. As global
capitalism turned toward a post-Fordist mode of regulation, corporations
adopted forms of "flexible accumulation" that permitted them
to quickly alter product lines, access niche markets, and otherwise respond
to volatile consumer tastes. Corporations have increasingly rid themselves
of fixed costs (such as land and production facilities) and many members
of their permanent workforces, shifting instead to out-sourcing arrangements
for many of their products. Out-sourcing has enabled manufacturers
to slash payrolls and benefits, domesticate their remaining permanent
workers, and institute the just-in-time inventory practices essential
to servicing rapidly changing consumer demands. In this endless process
of "creative destruction," contemporary capitalism has once
again confounded political economists by resurrecting forms of production
once thought to be moribund, such as industrial homework and peasant-based
commodity production. The
Political Ecology of Bananas situates the farming community of Restin
Hill, St. Vincent, within the constraints of the global banana trade as
represented locally by Geest, the Dutch multinational that exports the
island's bananas. Without directly alluding to the earlier peasant
studies debate, Grossman demonstrates that corporations such as Geest
may actually prefer subcontracting arrangements with peasants for the
same qualities once extolled by Chayanov and noted in the neo-Marxist
literature. Peasants may be willing to work under conditions that are
unprofitable for larger entities due to their ability to generate some
of their own food needs (the "subsidy to capital" noted by de
Janvry and other political economists), as well as their capacity for
"self-exploitation" from their reliance on unpaid household
labor. Yet another reason that multinational corporations may prefer
peasants, rather than large landowners, as sources of agricultural commodities
is their comparative lack of power and inability to influence the state
vis à vis foreign capital. Much
of Grossman's analysis is given over to the appropriateness of regulation
theory (specifically, its characterization of the shift to post-Fordist
flexible accumulation) to understanding the growth of contract farming. Competition
between multinationals for markets and their corresponding need to reduce
costs under flexible accumulation compel them to shift away from costly
plantation-based operations to contract farming. Similarly, to compete
for consumers in the developed countries the banana companies have emphasized
product appearance, in turn forcing their peasant suppliers to comply
with steadily increasing standards of fruit quality. "Blemishes that
were once ignored by customers ten or twenty years ago," Grossman
notes, "make produce unsalable today" (p. 196) His analysis
demonstrates how this seemingly benign trend has entailed significant,
even devastating, consequences for health, labor and the environment in
peasant communities such as Restin Hill. Peasants have had to endure
a succession of ever more complicated company-imposed processing and packing
procedures that have dramatically increased demands for their labor and
expertise. Corporate expectations for fruit quality have also forced
farmers to rely on a widening array of hazardous agro-chemicals, many
of which are deployed in high doses and with little or no protective clothing.
As in
other banana industries based on contract farming (Moberg 1997), Geest
requires that its suppliers employ specific production procedures and
inputs, and assigns prices to their fruit based on non-negotiable scoring
criteria and procedures. The state, in the form of a statutory corporation
(the St. Vincent Banana Growers Association), acts as an intermediary
between individual growers and foreign capital. Because it employs
extension agents that oversee the implementation of techniques and inputs
mandated by Geest, it is the SVBGA rather than the corporation that often
draws the ire of small farmers forced to comply with seemingly arbitrary
production requirements. Other researchers (Clapp 1994; Watts 1994)
have inferred from such coercive practices that the peasants involved
in sub-contracting schemes are actually "disguised wage laborers"
whose control over the production process is illusory. Similarly,
regulation theorists have claimed that contract farming entails a de-skilling
of labor comparable to that found in Fordist industry as a means of enhancing
corporate control of labor and profit generation. Grossman demonstrates
that both concepts are simplistic if not entirely inapplicable to banana
growers on St. Vincent. Paralleling Scott's (1985) concept of "everyday
forms of peasant resistance," residents of Restin Hill surreptitiously
divert company-supplied inputs to their own food crops or sell their produce
to alternative buyers. As for the claim that contract farming imposes
a series of simplified de-skilled operations on peasant producers, Grossman
shows that rising standards for fruit quality have instead astronomically
increased demands made of peasants in terms of labor and technical expertise
since the 1960s. The most telling indication of this process is the
size of the technical manual provided to farmers by extension agents,
which increased from 19 pages in length in 1966 to 107 pages by 1993!
In addition
to assessing applications of regulation theory to contract farming, The
Political Ecology of Bananas analyzes the impact of banana farming on
food production and environmental quality on St. Vincent. Here his
employment of a political ecology framework draws connections between
the global and local systems, and human and natural environments, that
are too often overlooked in more narrowly ecological or political economic
perspectives. In contrast to arguments that any land or labor directed
toward export production in peasant communities necessarily reduces their
commitment to staple foods, the relationship between these activities
in Restin Hill is more complex than might be assumed. Banana production
does tend to limit food crop cultivation, but only indirectly as farmers
have found that their export crops, together with the intensive demands
for their processing and packing, are less likely to be stolen by neighbors
than are food crops (p. 186). Similarly, Grossman reveals the unanticipated
consequences of corporate requirements of input use on the environment
and food production. The adoption of organochlorine insecticides
and herbicides in the 1960s has since fueled a vicious and ultimately
futile technological treadmill in which pests develop resistance to existing
treatments, forcing peasants to apply new chemicals in increasing doses. Because
of the proliferation of chemical-resistant pests on local farms, peasants
now routinely spray chemicals intended for bananas on their food crops
as well, raising uncertainties about their eventual health effects. Many
recent analyses of globalization risk the same limitation that world systems
approaches often encountered in the 1970s and 80s, one that anthropologist
June Nash summarized as "the problem of the passive periphery"
(1981: 398) Political economists have tended to portray postcolonial
societies as "passive" entities whose characteristics are determined
by their insertion into the global system. The residents of Restin
Hill confront imperious demands by the banana multinational that purchases
their fruit, blame extension agents rather than Geest for their difficulties
and low prices, and mix terrifying "chemical cocktails" for
use in their farms. Are they, then, another illustration of peasants
haplessly ensnared in political economic structures beyond their control? To
his credit, Grossman shows that the new sub-contracting, born of the incessant
grasp for profit under flexible accumulation, also offers its victims
unexpected spaces for maneuver and resistance. Neither capital nor
the state can entirely regiment the production process, control the utilization
of inputs on farms, or even compel peasants to grow bananas for export
in the first place. This careful, insightful, frequently brilliant
analysis of contract farming reveals the constraints and opportunities
of the contemporary global system, and restores some measure of agency
to the peasant communities that are involved in it. References
Cited: Clapp, Roger.
De Janvry, Alain.
Moberg, Mark.
Nash, June.
Scott, James.
Watts, Michael J..
|